An Unexpected Relative

Important Notice: For improved security and optimized performance to access our website, we encourage you to upgrade your browser to Chrome, Firefox, or Edge. ChromeFirefoxEdge

PremierBank Online Banking

Log In

Error, press "Log In" to continue.

Log In

Error, press "Log In" to continue.

Log In

Error, press "Log In" to continue.

An Unexpected Relative

 

An Unexpected Relative

article retirement

In 2018, Loch David Crane, a California resident, died without having made a will. His reasons for not taking care of this important financial chore are unknown, but perhaps it was because he had no surviving spouse, children, siblings, or grandparents. Under California law, that meant his heirs were the descendants of his grandparents. The only such descendant from the paternal grandparents was Shannon Wehsener, a cousin.

Shannon was named the administrator of the Crane estate. On January 8, 2020, she filed her report and petition for distribution of the estate with the probate court. On February 21, 2020, Judy Scherber filed an objection, claiming that she also was an heir.

Mr. Crane’s mother had an adopted brother, Charles Bloodgood. Judy’s mother had abandoned her as an infant. When she was two years old, Judy’s father asked Charles and his wife to babysit her—then never returned to pick her up. Charles and his wife raised Judy as their own daughter, but they never formally adopted her. When the family moved to Indiana, Charles said he was Judy’s father when she was enrolled in school. In his will, Charles called Judy his daughter.

In his entire life Mr. Crane never met either Judy or Charles, as neither of them had been to California. Judy only learned about her potential inheritance when she was contacted by a company that locates missing heirs for a share of their inheritances.

The legal question is whether Judy is a descendant of Crane’s grandparents. Had the adoption formalities been attended to, the answer would be yes in all jurisdictions. But under Indiana law, where Judy lives, the answer is no.

California has a more expansive, less formal rule, under which Charles is presumed to be Judy’s “natural parent” unless clear and convincing evidence to the contrary is presented. No such evidence was offered, and Judy’s attorneys persuaded the California courts that the California rule should apply. Judy gets half of the estate

The Court’s decision does not reveal how large the Crane estate was—but it was at least large enough to support four years of legal proceedings.

Do you have a question concerning wealth management or trusts? Call us at 920-563-6616 ext. 3070, or email wealth@bankwithpremier.com.

 

© 2023 M.A. Co. All rights reserved.
Any developments occurring after June 1, 2023, are not reflected in this article.

You should always consult with your tax advisor before making any decisions. Not FDIC insured, not insured by any government agency, no bank guarantee, may lose value.

Back to Top